2 Comments

Without having any data either to inform my response, I think your analysis is compelling, just based on my own experience and observations. The "Matthew Effect" is real! As you note, the feedback loop is comprised of both external influences and one's internal response, meaning reductionist analyses that focus on only one of these factors is necessarily incomplete and misleading, though at least a focus purely on internal factors, while naive, is not disempowering, the way a focus on purely external factors is. The problem seems to be that absent good guidance, people form their habitual internal response very early in life, well before they develop the wisdom and self-awareness to shape these habits consciously. But it's better late than never, when it comes to developing the understanding and maturity needed for improving our default responses.

Expand full comment
author

Daniel, excellent read on the article. You point about "absent good guidance" is incredibly important in the formation of our "selves" related to these factors - for both beauty and non-beauty. I did not really address that in the article so I appreciate you pointing it out. Once we withdraw and internalize to develop our habitual responses, we work within a stovepipe that again feeds back upon itself with no external guardrails. At these early stages in life, the impact of parental guidance cannot be understated. It could make all the difference in a life well led vs. a troubled life.

Expand full comment